Real Patriots Wear the Flag!

Yesterday’s Tax-Day protests by us teabaggers were great!  They were attended by people willing to make sure everyone who saw them knew that they were patriotic:

America is even greater when worn as a sweater!

I Always Cry At Weddings

These Christians know how to show eternal devotion to each other and the Prince:

Only Anti-Gay Gays Are Acceptable

Well, usually the forces that stand against families and the Bibles accuse those of us with more wholesome values of being bigots.  Just because we want to deny the equality and rights (excuse me. . . SPECIAL RIGHTS!) of others.  It is a foolish argument that lacks any sort of serious merit (on account of the fact that it contradicts my GOD!).

But today those allied with the wrong side of this debate cannot make even that claim, as there is now a gay who I support (but do not condone the trail of their sodomy that leads to hell).  That gay is Californian state senator Roy Ashburn, who was recently exposed as being a gay after a night of drinking at a bar for the gays.

There is no doubt that the story of Ashburn’s escapades gets me aroused with anger; but there is more to this story, and I am willing to listen:

Asked by Barks about his anti-gay voting record, Ashburn said, “I felt my duty, and I still feel this way, is to represent my constituents.”

Barks wanted assurances from Ashburn that he would continue to vote against LGBT rights issues, and she got it. “I believe firmly that my responsibility is to my constituents,” Ashburn told the Kern County talk show host.

So as long as Ashburn continues to vote to keep the gays like himself from having the full rights of citizens, I will support him.  And I will leave judgment up to God (because we all know what that will be).

Pam’s Blend of Perversion Tries to Out Our Agenda

It should be of no surprise that the radical lesbian (or should I just say “lesbian”) Pam Spaulding tries to out my hero Gary Randall.  She is determined to expose conservative Christians as being bigoted, and supporting the use of violence against gays:

From Randall’s point of view, if I disagree with someone who says that I should be executed because I’m gay, then somehow I’m being intolerant of that person’s religion.  The kind of tolerance Randall is looking for leads to violence.  Should I condone my own execution?  Randall apparently thinks so.

Randall sickeningly ended his post with a plea for donations to what he calls “this ministry“.  He is using his authority as a Christian minister to broadcast to the world his certainty that I and every other gay person deserve death.  When will the press and general society stop giving people like Randall a pass because he calls himself a Christian and a pastor and uses nice words like “faith”?  Let’s recognize his words for what they really are: a condoning of lethal violence against gay people.

That is totally unfair.  Randall has never directly called for any such thing, nor would he.  Gary Randall is way too smart to let that part of our agenda slip out into the public yet.

My fellow Biblical Christians, we have much work to do before we can openly do what needs to be done.  Which is why I encourage everyone who is reading this to denounced Pam Spaulding (hmmmm, a lesbian with a sporty last name should come as no surprise) as being a radical that will use any means to advance her agenda to destroy the American family.

We must destroy her before she can destroy us before we have the chance to destroy her!

Plus her hair is way too short for woman, but we’ll deal with that when it comes time to reeducate her.

The Tolerance of Perverts

In another of one of his inspired call to arms against a fallen culture (and a fine fund raising pitch as well), Gary Randall takes on the liberal idea of tolerance:

Whether it is the NCAA or the city of Beverly Hills or a number of other public entities, there is an increasing trend to re-write or re-define biblical morality, while simultaneously seeking to silence those who believe in it.

That is the problem with this country isn’t it?  Non-religious institutions like cities and sports associations just aren’t willing to fight for religious values.  Not to mention that they even refuse to give us a public stage (and the legitimacy that comes with it) to persuade other Americans to deny the rights of their fellow citizens.  That amounts to censorship in my book, and evidently in Gary Randall’s as well:

It seems tolerance is a one way street and the distaste for biblical Christianity is driving it from the public square, public discourse, education and even the free expression of beliefs in the paid media.

Ironically, intolerance of Christianity and a Christian influenced culture is most often demanded in the name of tolerance.

Christianity as we define it anyway:

Christianity must not be tolerated because of the need for greater tolerance. A Perverted Tolerance.

We get what you’re saying Gary (wink).  He is talking about tolerance for perverts and tolerance for their constant assault on our morals with their homo erotic imagery. Which is why he used boldfaced type to say it.

I would hate to be on the receiving end of that.  I don’t know if I could take it like that from Gary Randall.  I’m glad he’s on God’s side.

Liberals Want Race War In North Seattle

Well look who wants to play the race card about how nice North Seattle is.  That would be Seattle P-I blogger Susie Rantz, who has the usual amount of white liberal guilt about living in the statistically caucasian area of Godless North Seattle.

Fortunately there were many fair-minded conservatives ready to show Ms. Rantz why she is so wrong to even write about this issue.  Folks like commonsenseinseattle:

i don’t notice things like this. i am not a liberal.

i don’t walk around and focus on the skin color of people around me.

How right you are commonsenseinseattle!  Not noticing the racial make up of our neighborhoods is the best way to make sure that we have no problems with race.  How can there be a problem if no one pays attention to it?

There can’t.

That is why I applaud commonsenseinseattle for refusing to report his race to the 2010 census.  It takes a brave man to stand-up to the US government like that.  And in standing up we can truly move towards a society that ignores race entirely and allows us to have neighborhoods that truly reflect who we are.

And that isn’t so bad, just as this bravely posted anonymous comment tells us:

Why is it wrong to want to be around people who you have something in common with? What is racist about that? I have absolutely nothing in common with people who like hip hop music and do drive bys. I don’t want them in my neighborhood, and I don’t want my children anywhere near them. Believe it or not, from what I’ve read here and heard about the “black community”, the feeling is apparently mutual. Homogeneous is not in and of itself bad or racist.

Absolutely!  This comment also shows us that the attitudes of those that live in the “homogeneous” neighborhoods of North Seattle create accurate and insightful observations of the “communities” of others.

The biggest reason why we shouldn’t examine race in North Seattle, or in America for that matter, is that the solution is far too frightening, as another anonymous comment makes clear:

It is clear that drastic government action is required to force North Seattle to come to love the the infinite joy of coerced diversity. Tolerance is insufficient. The white people must be made to embrace and crave multiculturalism. Their personal desires must be made subservient to the goals of collectivist eco-racial utopianism.

See, it does us no good to look at the problem when the only solution is an unrecognizable commie liberal landscape.  These patriotic (and mostly anonymous) commentators deserve our thanks the showing us how real Americans look at things.

The Great Mysteries of Gary Randall

One of the blessings of a truly God centered life is the freedom of not having to understand everything you are told.  That ability to listen without understanding is the key to the latest post by Gary Randall at Faith and Freedom Network:

“Plan B” or the abortion pill, sometimes called the morning after pill, has become a well known and controversial method of abortion.

Walking into yesterday’s health care meeting, the President assured a reporter he had a “plan B”.

Planned Parenthood’s website also features “Plan B” and says it costs between $10 and $70, considerably less than the President’s plan.

I have no idea what he is talking about.  But what I do know is that the abortion pill is bad, and anything to do with Kenyan president Barack Obama is bad (especially healthcare).

The mystery doesn’t stop there:

The Planned Parenthood site also feature’s an “Accidents Happen” section which tells you what to do after an accident.

Will the President need a “Plan B”?

President Obama ended yesterday’s meeting with a threat.

“If we’re unable to resolve differences over health care,” he said, “we will move ahead with decisions.”

One wonders if Gary Randall has been dipping into some of the sacramental wine (which is his right as the shepherd of Christians in Washington and possibly Oregon).  One thing is for sure he is willing to ask the hard questions, even if we don’t really know what he is talking about when he asks them:

The question is what will President Obama do the morning after? Will there have been a malfunction? Will there be a need for emergency measures?

It is hard to tell, especially since I’m still not entirely sure what malfunction the morning after Gary is talking about, nor do I know what emergency measures he is referring to.  But that is the beauty of faith.  I don’t need to.

What is important is that we know that he is telling us about the evil of Obama, and the destruction (whatever it is) that that evil will cause.  What is important is that we listen as if we understood, and then give, so that Gary might continue to do whatever it is he does to fight the evil (whatever it is) that is being perpetrated.

Is that clear?

Why 2010 Must Not Be 2006

This is what we are fighting against:

Liberalism, it makes little girls cry and young boys look like they are in European surrealist films.

Liberal Elite to Blame

The previous post was published in a previous unedited form.  Obviously this site is being targeted by liberals who don’t like the truth.  They somehow got into the internet tubes and ruined my masterpiece.  The previous post has been clean-up; but post I wanted was much longer, but I am too busy watching prime time television for evidence of the downfall of western civilization to restore it to what I originally wanted.

Gary Randall Explains “Reconciliation”

I was as happy as a little girl in the Sunday best (that her strict God fearing mother dressed her in) to read Gary Randall’s post on what all this talk about “reconciliation” means when it comes to the Kenyan president Barack Obama taking healthcare away from our doctors, and putting it in the hands of the government. (Except for when it comes to getting in between a woman and her doctor when she wants to kill her unborn child of GOD!)

He starts off by giving us the religious definition, before diving into the governMENTAL one (which if I have my way will be one and the same someday). Then he uses his righteous sword of snarkyness to slay the Democrat position:

It’s interesting and revealing what leading Democrats, including Senator Barack Obama, Senator Joe Biden and Senator Hillary Clinton, were saying about “reconciliation” aka., the nuclear option, just a few years ago.

It is revealing, and fortunately Gary doesn’t reveal to us that reconciliation has nothing to do with the “nuclear option” debated “just a few years ago.”